The Decade of Downtown
Rate This Article:
3
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

In Kansas City, the first decade of the 21st Century will be remembered as the decade of downtown.

It remains to be seen whether these last ten years brought the city’s renaissance or its financial Waterloo. But either way, it’s undeniably The Big Story.

Here’s my rundown of the most important events of the downtown decade.

Fair warning: They’re not the ones you’d expect. You won’t find the opening of the Sprint Center or the not-yet-completely-opened opening of the Power & Light District.

No, these are the key moments in the massive shift of power that caused billions of dollars to pour into downtown.

March 2000 – Barnes Gives Eco Devo Legal Contracts to Her Cronies

In one of the best articles I’ve ever read in the Star, Mark Couch (who moved on to the Denver Post and was replaced by Kevin Collison) reported that newly elected Mayor Kay Barnes had secretly awarded the lucrative contracts to represent the city’s economic development programs to her friends Herb Kohn and Mike Burke.

She denied it at the time, of course. Her chief of staff Joe Serviss told Couch, “She wasn't involved in the process.”

Yeah right.

Kohn and Burke are with Bryan Cave and King Hershey, respectively. Burke gave Barnes $5,000 during her election campaign. And Kohn was so close to Barnes that City Hall insiders freely spread stories about them that, if untrue, were slanderous.

I was never able to substantiate those rumors. But this much is clear: Kohn was Barnes’s right hand man during her legacy-building years and he was paid handsomely for it (Couch reported a $20,000 monthly retainer plus hourly billings as high as $250).

We have him to thank for the secretly negotiated deal with the Cordish Company, the out-of-town developers who built the Power & Light District – the deal we’re now paying $11 million to cover because the original numbers were so far off.

Without Kohn, who knows what might have happened downtown.

And without Mark Couch reporting on development for the Star. Well, we know what happened there.

Which brings us to…

September 2001 – Star Hires Kevin Collison

Every multi-billion dollar campaign to permanently alter a city needs a minister of propaganda, and the Star was happy to supply one.

The earliest Collison story I could find was from September 7 – “Construction Data Mixed for KC Area.” In less than a week he was greasing the wheels of the KC development scam with a 527-word piece about “a tax increment financing plan that would clear an industrial building and help develop an archaeological park” in the River Market.

(For more about Collison, read this.)

Columnist’s note: These next several highlights are all interrelated. I hadn’t realized they were until I started doing research for this column and I saw how they all flow together.

July 2002 – Star Announces Plans to build $200 Million Printing Plant Downtown

The Star broke the news of its own big development, of course. In his report on the announcement, Collison punched up the first sentence with two adjectives: “massive” and “dramatic.” Then-publisher Arthur Brisbane said, “This truly represents a great future for us."

August 2002 – Voters Turn Down a Plan to Spend Bond Money Downtown

Ordinarily, this would be a no brainer for voters: Approve the renewal of some capital improvement bonds and, without raising taxes, you’ll have more money to fix up streets, curbs and sidewalks, bridges, sewers, etc.

But this time around the city’s elites had secretly decided they wanted to invest a hefty chunk of that money downtown. But Kansas Citians weren’t about to let them do it.

Why?

Kansas Citians were sick of their so-called leaders – civic and business leaders, elected officials – spending so much of the city’s money on these big ticket items instead of the stuff that the city really needs: solid, well-maintained infrastructure.

In fact, just five years earlier, the KC muckity mucks were in agreement with them. They had served on and supported a blue-ribbon commission that came up with a plan to stop the dream chasing and to start paying for infrastructure.

But as soon as a new dream came along – revitalize downtown – they threw the sensible “fund infrastructure” plan out the window.

For once, though, voters saw through it and turned them down.

But the downtown boosters had little to worry about. They had the Star (and its $199 million real estate investment) on their side.

And you know what they say about folks who buy ink by the gallon.

September 2002 – Star Runs Six-Part Series on Downtown

“Mending Our Broken Heart,” debuting on September 22, was more than an in-depth series. It was an impassioned battle cry.

A sustained impassioned battle cry.

It didn’t just last a week, like the paper’s recent Pulitzer attempt about modern-day slavery.

This one went on for six weeks – the same six weeks leading up to Election Day in early November.

And guess what was on that ballot.

That’s right. The same downtown bonds voters had turned down in August.

They passed this time. The Star propaganda no doubt helped.

Coincidence? Doesn’t look like one to me.

In the big scheme of things, these bonds didn’t pump a ton of money into downtown. They were just a drop in the bucket.

But in terms of the shift in power, perception and symbolism, the campaign to pass those bonds and rob the city’s infrastructure to pay for downtown was a huge, huge victory.

November 2002 – Danaher Drops Out

After the win at the polls in early November, the downtown champions had one last foe to topple. Two-term City Council member Paul Danaher was mounting a campaign to unseat Kay Barnes.

He was running on a campaign to stop spending so much money on legacy projects and instead pay for repairs to the city’s crumbling infrastructure, which had ballooned into several billion dollars worth of broken sidewalks, crumbling streets and leaky sewer lines.

It was one that would have no doubt resonated with voters.

Problem was, Danaher couldn’t get any of the city’s super-rich people to come out and support him. (At least that’s what he told me at the time.)

Since then, other key events have occurred. Wayne Cauthen was hired as City Manager in February 2003. Barnes made Chuck Eddy head of the Finance and Audit Committee in April of that same year. They both played key roles in making this the decade of downtown.

But by then it was pretty much already a done deal. The forces that drive this city had shifted.

And now we have a bit of suburbia right in the heart of downtown.

And it looks like we’re going to be paying for it for a long, long time.

Post A Comment
* Indicates required information
Comment Title:
* Comments:
Nickname:
* Validation:
Comments 5 comments for this article
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Added: January 01, 2010. 06:29 PM CST
Old Star Reporter Mark Couch
Joe: Hey, I think it would be interesting to ask Couch about what he saw when he covered the TIF Commission. Why DON'T you get a hold of him and ask him to write a paragraph or two about how it was run--and then JUST REPRINT what he says?

I bet it would be interesting.

DO IT JOE!
CityGuyReturns!
Added: December 30, 2009. 10:25 AM CST
further review needed
Good article. I am intrigued by CityGuy's point about a hidden report.
Collision really must be peeved at all this recent attention he is getting. I would like to see similar scrutity of those who have direct influence on the process, current EDC leaders and counsel. I am sure that looking at these people closely will reveal even more interesting findings.
in_the_loop
Added: December 29, 2009. 09:44 AM CST
What We're Not Talking About
Forget all the environmental stuff for a moment. Let's look at some conservative touch points.

Taxes: For the 70 years since WWII, yards and parking lots have been getting bigger which means there are fewer taxpayers on more infrastructure. It doesn't take a finance expert to figure out that this puts upward pressure on taxes.

Child Rearing: In the old walkable neighborhoods, children played in the front and the houses were close enough together that many adults could see them. In modern neighborhoods they are in the backyard where only one set of parents can supervise them. As Jane Jacobs said, "The children have moved from under the eyes of a high numerical ratio of adults, into a place where the ratio of adults is low or even nil. To think this represents an improvement in city child rearing is pure daydreaming."

I should also mention that distances in exurban neighborhoods have grown to the point that, to have any life at all, children have to be chauffeured around like little princes and princesses. Yet we can't figure out why so many people grow up expecting the world to be handed to them on a silver platter.

Values: There's research that shows high traffic volumes on a street decrease the amount of social contact between neighbors (as if that's a surprise). What does this have to do with values? Though values must come from within, they are supported and reinforced socially. Is it any coincidence that baby-boomers, the first generation to grow up in automobile suburbs, were also the first to not just reject old ways of doing things, but to actually thumb their noses and extend their middle fingers at old ways of doing things?

Strangely, no one is talking about any of this. Contrary to popular opinion, liberals are concerned about these issues. (I'm conceding that they often come to different conclusions than conservatives regarding them.) Liberals just don't get fired up about them.

The real puzzle is that conservatives are ignoring them. It's like they're trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Joe Medley
Added: December 28, 2009. 11:59 PM CST
What happened to the old KC Star reporter?
Joe: I heard that Mark Couch did his own in-depth analysis of the TIF program, but the Star buried the study. Couch then left town. Is there a story here?
CityGuy
Added: December 28, 2009. 11:51 AM CST
Drivel
You libs want less sprawl and more density. You want to stop focusing money on the suburbs. You want investment back into the city. You want jobs within easy access of the people. You want, you want, you want - you just don't want to pay for it...
Anonymous
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Google